Difference between revisions of "Modern Interpretive Methods"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The historical-critical method, developed in the 19th-century, has dominated exegesis in the past several generations. However, over the | + | The historical-critical method, developed in the 19th-century, has dominated exegesis in the past several generations. However, over the past 50 years different so-called "contextual" readings have developed (i.e. theologies of liberation), as well canonical and theological readings of biblical texts. |
==Recommended Reading== | ==Recommended Reading== | ||
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
| + | Joel Green, "Hearing the New Testament: Strategies for Interpretation" | ||
==[[Canonical Areas]]== | ==[[Canonical Areas]]== | ||
Latest revision as of 22:51, 22 May 2019
The historical-critical method, developed in the 19th-century, has dominated exegesis in the past several generations. However, over the past 50 years different so-called "contextual" readings have developed (i.e. theologies of liberation), as well canonical and theological readings of biblical texts.
Contents
Recommended Reading
Resources
Joel Green, "Hearing the New Testament: Strategies for Interpretation"
Canonical Areas
Holy Scripture
Content of Scripture
a. Books of the Bible & Category b. Major Biblical Figures c. Major Biblical Themes
Context of Scripture
a. Historical Context b. Canonical Context c. Literary Context d. Transmission / Translation
Interpretive Methods
a. Patristic Interpretive Methods b. Medieval Interpretive Methods c. Reformation Interpretive Methods d. Modern Interpretive Methods
