Difference between revisions of "Modern Interpretive Methods"

From ACNA West Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Resources)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The historical-critical method, developed in the 19th-century, has dominated exegesis in the past several generations. However, over the pats 50 years different so-called "contextual" readings have developed (i.e. theologies of liberation), as well canonical and theological readings of biblical texts.
+
The historical-critical method, developed in the 19th-century, has dominated exegesis in the past several generations. However, over the past 50 years different so-called "contextual" readings have developed (i.e. theologies of liberation), as well canonical and theological readings of biblical texts.
  
 
==Recommended Reading==
 
==Recommended Reading==

Latest revision as of 22:51, 22 May 2019

The historical-critical method, developed in the 19th-century, has dominated exegesis in the past several generations. However, over the past 50 years different so-called "contextual" readings have developed (i.e. theologies of liberation), as well canonical and theological readings of biblical texts.

Recommended Reading

Resources

Joel Green, "Hearing the New Testament: Strategies for Interpretation"

Canonical Areas

Holy Scripture

Content of Scripture

a. Books of the Bible & Category b. Major Biblical Figures c. Major Biblical Themes

Context of Scripture

a. Historical Context b. Canonical Context c. Literary Context d. Transmission / Translation

Interpretive Methods

a. Patristic Interpretive Methods b. Medieval Interpretive Methods c. Reformation Interpretive Methods d. Modern Interpretive Methods